An Islamic cleric standing trial over an alleged coup plot against President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has told the Federal High Court in Abuja that he warned those behind the plan that it would fail.
In a video statement played before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, Sheikh Sani Abdulkadir said he became involved through a man identified as Sanda, who allegedly approached him on behalf of a military officer known as Colonel Maaji for prayers and spiritual guidance over plans to remove the government.
- Bauchi Progressives Forum Rejects “Fictitious” APC Governorship Primary Results
- Grace Ike Promotes Education Through School Quiz Competition
- How My Trusted Security Aide Contributed to Overthrow Me — Gowon
- 2026 Press Week: NUJ President Calls for Better Protection, Welfare, Ethical Journalism
- Why I Left Peter Obi for Tinubu – Cubana Chief Priest
According to the cleric, after prayers and consultations, he warned that the operation would not succeed and that some members would eventually expose the plot.
He also said money was later sent to him for prayers and charity work, while names of people linked to the alleged operation were given to him for mention during prayers.
Abdulkadir told investigators he became suspicious after learning that Colonel Maaji had disappeared before reports later emerged about arrests connected to the alleged coup plot.
He denied supporting any illegal act, insisting the money he received was only for religious purposes.
Although he admitted knowing the meaning of a military coup, he said he did not report the matter to security agencies because he did not know who to approach.
The cleric further explained that he was arrested after discovering that his bank account had been restricted while trying to withdraw some of the money allegedly sent for prayers.
After the video was played in court, prosecutors asked to submit written statements and video recordings obtained from the six defendants.
However, defence lawyers objected, arguing that the statements were obtained against the provisions of the law.
They claimed some defendants had no legal representation and were pressured into making statements.
Justice Joyce Abdulmalik later ordered a joint trial-within-trial to determine whether the statements and video recordings were made voluntarily.
The case was adjourned until May 12 for further hearing.